The BBC – Now As Useless As ITV
We won’t know who the World Cup winners are until Sunday night, but this World Cup’s losers are far easier to identify. They’ll be in the Match of the Day studio passing comment. Alan Hansen, Alan Shearer and Mark Lawrenson, take a bow. Your unrivalled incompetence has brought about a situation that few could ever have thought possible. The BBC’s football coverage is now as risible as the putrid effluence spewed out by ITV.
When it comes to global football, this motley collection of has-beens and shouldn’t have-beens simply don’t know, don’t care and don’t even realise that with every passing second of air-time they are insulting your intelligence. You, the people of Britain, are paying for their extended all-expenses trip to South Africa and they can’t even reward you by spending five minutes on the loo with a copy of World Soccer.
If ever there was a case for examining the role of a publicly funded broadcaster, it’s when Shearer admits that his knowledge of the team he is being paid to comment upon is ‘limited’, or when Hansen growls rebelliously at the thought of having to watch the second half of Algeria against Slovenia because it’s his birthday. When the one pundit who seems to actually do some research, Lee Dixon, pointed out that Marek Hamsik was one to watch, Hansen sneered at him and suggested that someone must have given him that tip. Hamsik is one of the most sought-after players in Europe!
Mind you, for real incompetence, there’s only one place to go. My neighbours still recall the piercing howl of rage when the perennially ill-informed Lawrenson was forced to ask his co-commentator whether or not Kaka had ‘played much last season’. Here’s us, the licence payers, clubbing together to send ‘Lawro’ on the trip of a lifetime and he doesn’t even know whether one of the top five footballers on the planet has been getting much of a game at his new club.
You expect this kind of thing from ITV. They’ve always been useless at football, but it doesn’t matter. Their coverage is self-funded, propelled by the adverts that they occasionally smear across the most important part of a match like a toddler’s snot. You don’t get mad with ITV for being rubbish because it’s like getting mad with a puppy for pissing on the carpet. It’s what they do and, in a way, it’s your fault for letting them in the house in the first place. But the BBC is supposed to be a bastion of quality, a stronghold against the forces of commercialism. They’re supposed to be good at this, for pity’s sake.
Football fans, despite what the producers of Match of the Day apparently believe, are not idiots. Granted, anyone who has ever listened to a radio phone-in will know that there is an anti-Darwinism at the heart of every broadcast, a survival of the thickest as sensible voices are drowned out by braying morons. And yet football fans have never been so knowledgeable. The regular coverage of European leagues on satellite television has allowed us to gaze upon a world outside the bloated hyperbole of the Premier League. The internet has put the planet’s media at our fingertips. With every click of a mouse, it’s possible to find a new blog, tapped out for free by an enthusiast who has forgotten more about world football than ‘Lawro’ will ever remember.
Germany, according to Hansen, are an average team, but if they’re average, what on earth does that make England and Argentina? Robert Vittek was described as ‘an unknown’ by Shearer. That might have been true at the start of the tournament, assuming you could ignore seven years in the Bundesliga and La Ligue, but it certainly wasn’t the case four games in when he was the tournament’s joint leading scorer. Time and time again, pundits were asked to pick out ‘dangermen’ and all they could do was identify a player who had once played in England. Just ten minutes on the internet would have saved them their public humiliation. Shearer was so bad that the joke Twitter account @shearers_a2z , where a fake Alan Shearer makes ludicrous assertions about world football, received a number of messages from angry readers who thought it was real.
It doesn’t have to be like this. The BBC’s commentators, for example, were excellent. Jacqui Oatley coped admirably with an unfamiliar, borderline unpronounceable Greek team despite the fact that David Pleat, a man who has 17 different ways of saying Julian Joachim, was sat next to her. Steve Wilson, Simon Brotherton and Guy Mowbray all put the hours in, piling up the facts and the stats on even the most unfamiliar of nations. It can be done.
For the love of God, everyone in the media makes mistakes, me more than anyone, but the rubbish that the BBC have churned out isn’t an accident. It’s the result of a complete lack of effort from people in an incredibly fortunate situation. My newspaper could only send one member of staff to South Africa. The BBC sent 295.
We paid for all of that and I can’t be the only viewer who wants his money back.

On the other hand do you really want to live without Lawrenson’s “corridor of uncertainty”?
Well said, I couldn’t agree more.
Another gripe about Shearer is how often he comments on a teams tactics being “absolutely spot on” or “all over the place” without ever explaining why.
He also provided the most cringeworthy moment of the World Cup when asking a black South African, who was old enough to remember the introduction of segregation, “how did you feel about that”.
I had high expectations for Seedorf this World Cup, everytime I have heard him in the past he has came across as very articulate and knowledgeable about all things football. But with the BBC he hardly says anything and just laughs at Hansen’s stupid jokes.
It’s Lawrenson’s sourness that rankles as well. It’s like the whole thing is far too much trouble and everything about it depresses him. He never shows any enthusiasm for the sport, the tournament, the teams – I like world-weariness as much as the next man, but not in my punditry. It’s like he doesn’t know why he’s bothering and finds it incomprehensible that you are either.
> a survival of the thickest as sensible voices are drowned out by braying morons
Sounds like Wikipedia
Spot on. Although you amusingly misspell Hamsik in the middle of a rant about how well-known he is…
Oops! Sorry, it was the rage. I was typing too quickly and the tears of frustration blinded me. Changed now.
Bravo. I’ve been ranting similar stuff for years.
With the wonders of TV technology I live the luxury of recording MOTD just to fast forward the obtuse, stating the obvious, devoid of anything insightful drivel from Shearer and co between the action.
Add to Wilson, Brotherton and Mowbray the likes of Vickery, Wheelock and Brassell – regular contributors to BBC’s WFPI and you have proof the BBC can get it right in other worlds.
It’s Shearer that gets to me the most. He never passes on any sort of decent critical analysis of a game and, as mentioned, never gives a reason to his answers. It’s not hard to guess what simple-minded comment he’s going to share each time he opens his mouth. And I’ve noticed, he seems quite uncomfortable when Jürgen Klinsmann is in the studio, of whom has a better English vocabulary than Shearer.
Also on Shearer: when he did his little tour of a local South African neighbourhood the other week (probably the only time he’s been out of the confines of the BBC studio and his personal gym), supposedly he was there to understand the impact of the World Cup in the area. But all he did was ask, “So are you gonna be supporting England, yeah?” So worthless.
This article is spot on. And again a sad statement of our media and it`s pro-Premier league/English biased. Our media seems to be so myopic and almost xenophobic it begs belief. Ignorance outweighs IQ once again.
I wrote a piece on http://www.theoffsideflag.4fan.org/wp/?p=457 around the media in England..
And another one here on the England teams failings http://www.theoffsideflag.4fan.org/wp/?p=470
Great article sir. I will be visiting here for more from now on.
Daryl
i’m so glad it isn’t just me that thought this way! There is, i submit, a link between the poor level of pundits and their analysis, and the pathetic state of our national team. Both are symptomatic of how the game is driven by the media’s need to give people the lowest, easiest drivel. And the masses are either too stupid or lazy to realise that the very people who are telling them it is “the best league in the world” are the ones who keep taking their money. Emperor’s clothes. It is the self fulfilling frenzy between mass media, lowest denominator tv, and subscription tv that means that the game is doomed. People will either see through it all eventually, or they won’t and it’ll just go on by throwing money at players. In either case, the rich will just get richer at the expense of the beautiful game.
@ LardyBoyMark: Yes, quite a frightening prospect isn`t it.
Welcome to the Sky generation.
Spot on Ian, it has really, really been frustrating to be forced to listen to baffoons..the whole thing is a club..sky, BBC, 5 live & talk sport..
You have cretins like Alan green that whatEVER they say..they get away with..& on the likes of espn / satanta who have the chance to bring in new quality but instead go for the reject cretins!!!
Then there’s ppl like Adrian Durham & gough (wasn’t he a cricketer) hosting football phone in debate shows when they have no right what so ever to such a privilaged platform.
There needs to be another sports/football radio station..doesn’t matter how low budget..it could be a fat bloke with a mike ranting in his living room..as long as it has knowledgeable ppl..these ppl need a bit of competition to kick them up the backside.
There are obv some ppl worth listening to outthere..philippe auclair, paddy barklay, marcotti, James richardson to name a few..but not enough of them at the forefront..& so they can get lost in the sea of rubbish out there..
2nd yellow’s point on the segregation question…dear oh dear
No special love for Jonathan Pearce? Otherwise, total agreement here. Mark Bright’s comment about (paraphrasing) “I’ve seen Messi live 3 or 4 times and he’s never impressed me” deserves special idiotic mention. Him instructing a David Villa, one of the stars of the tournament, what exactly he should be doing made me want to reach into the tv and punch him straight in the jaw.
Although Mick McCarthy is a guilty pleasure.
Ugh, Mark Bright. I remember him lambasting Totti at every opportunity in 2006 and he continued his rank idiocy in 2010 by, as you mention, implying Messi was overrated. “I’ve seen him 3 or 4 times and he’s never impressed me.” Ignorant on so many different levels.
Him and Colin Murray are enough to make me turn the sound off.
Very good article. The most insulting for me was one game in which the commentator (can’t remember which one) pulled out a genuinely interesting statistic and Lawrenson had the nerve to ridicule him as some sort of geek! As if it was somehow ‘uncool’ to have the slightest bit of insight on the game you’re being paid to present! It really is unbelievable, and it never seems to change.
I wrote a similarly frustrated piece about the Beeb here:
http://www.just-football.com/2010/06/on-the-bbcs-endless-moaning-about-goals-entertaining-football/
In my opinion it is no coincidence that the broadcast I’ve enjoyed most was last night’s Holland v Uruguay game, i.e. the one where the co-commentator didn’t turn up. In South Africa no broadcast had a co-commentator and it was far more enjoyable.
Completely agree. Any tiny amount of respect I had left for Hansen was destroyed after the Germany vs Argentina game when he refused to accept that Germany had been the better team, insisting that Argentina had just been poor.
I am however still incredibly grateful that I haven’t heard a single word from Andy Gray, the only man who predicts things after they’ve happened, although that may just be because he is so totally oblivious to the fact that there is football outside of the Premier League.
Great work Iain.
Ian…tremendous work sir, I commend you. I have been banging on about Hansen, Lineker and latterly, Shearer for ages, much to the annoyance of my family as to how I can get so steamed up! This World Cup has been the tipping point. The now well trodden path of ‘dumbing down’ that the BBC seem to think should be their mantra for football coverage these days has reached a new low in the last few weeks. I truly now believe that they BBC bosses are so convinced that the average TV viewer now is only interested in crap reality TV, that they now HAVE to present their football in this way. I totally detest Alan Hansen above all. The man is rude, ignorant, lazy, smug, and the way he treated Emmanuel Adebayor, you could even hang towards slightly xenophobic. A lot of the blame for the way this pathetic excuse for a so called “expert” is these days (would be interested to see his MOTD appearances 10 years ago with Des, compared to now) can be laid at his the foot of his equally obnoxious side kick, Mr Self Loving Gary Lineker. It’s no surprise that these two pompous ex pros holiday together in Barbados, you can imagine the scene as they admire each other’s tans lying on the beach with the new trophy women…”you’re so funny Al”, “no you’re better Gary”….”when should we start doing our research for the World Cup, Al?…..”Oh about 30 seconds before going on air Gary, no pressure”………..
They are there, not trying to analyse, inform or create debate; no “comedy” is the watch word for these two tired old faces. Shearer, a latecomer to the ‘Gary & Al’ show, is now the third member of the gang but you can tell it’s the dynamic duo, probably the highest paid broadcasters out in South Africa at the moment, who call the shots.
Just before the Germany vs Argentina game on Saturday I said to my son, who had been out of the room during the pre amble, to guess how Alan Hansen previewed both sides….”Hmmm let me see” he said, “slagging off Mertesacker and Demichelis perhaps?….spot on son. That will be Per Mertesacker being slated by, internationally under achieving Alan Hansen,. He’s been doing it for years. The same Mertesacker that has now played in a World Cup Semi Final, a European Championship Final and now another World Cup Semi Final. That is the extent of Alan Hansen’s knowledge of the “average” German team, that “England, man for man, will over power”
There are some notable exceptions in the BBC coverage, and by and large their Five Live coverage has been good, but even their standards are slipping, proved by the appalling Robbie Savage being paired with Alan Green……two 90 minute matches of ungrateful moaning, with no knowledge of tactics, players etc that these two came up with during the opening two rounds of group games.
To conclude I have been saying to my friends that for the first time I have been glad that a game is on ITV rather than the BBC, something I thought could never happen. The BBC must be aware of the bricks bats being hurled on a daily basis their way, but so far old thick skinned Hansen, Lineker and Shearer carry on in their depressing, smuggy smug, smug ways. I’ve said all this and not even mentioned the ludicrous and ignorant Mark Lawrenson, another one tossing off cheap jokes and indifference to anything outside of the Premier League, in return for a huge public funded wage….Here’s what the BBC came back with to my correspondence about their poor coverage, making no references to my specific points about Hansen’s attitude and Green’s uncomfortable rant about Algeria and their Goal Keeper in particular, I won’t be holding my breath waiting for any changes, anytime soon:
Thank you for your e-mail.
I understand that you’re unhappy with the content and quality of our World Cup coverage as you believe the presenters are of particularly poor standard and provide misleading information.
I can assure you that we aim for the highest standards of accuracy and talent throughout our services. All of our programme contributors are appointed on the basis of their experience and we don’t engage any presenter or commentator unless we believe they’re competent and can meet the specific demands required of them.
However, the range of tastes and opinions held by our audience is so diverse that it’s inevitable some viewers will dislike or disapprove of certain presenters and their style. Indeed, it’s a very rare personality who meets with everyone’s approval, and it’s clear that opinions can vary considerably.
I appreciate that you may continue to hold a differing view, so I’ve registered your comments on our audience log. This is a daily internal report of audience feedback which we circulate to all staff within the BBC, including those involved with this coverage and their senior management. It ensures that your concerns are circulated and considered across the BBC.
Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.
The whole article that has been produced is fantastic and to the point of what has really be wrong with the BBC this World Cup.
Their have been exceptions on the TV as well as still some excellent coverage by the BBC journalists online and FiveLive. But highlights of the TV coverage have mostly come from the new Liverpool boss Roy Hodgson as well as Wolves boss Mick McCarthey their ability to read the games as well as wealth of experience in the game at so many levels and countries really showed. Although Mick does have his off moments as well, but they can be forgiven.
I made a pretty extensive complaint myself tot he BBC like the post above and got the same templated response from the BBC. Which didn’t really pick up on the biggest problem. It is not that we oppose to them catering for different tastes, but we have paid our license fee and expect a higher quality of coverage, at least the money we are paying could help the pundits access the wealth of information that is in front of them to give us something that is worth listening too. What should the pundits be targeting to do, entertainment I expect from the players on the pitch, educate and inform is what I want from the people on the couch, why can’t they just give us that?
Alan Shearer telling me that North Korea are something if an unknown team, well they had two friendlies before the World Cup one against Greece where they showed exactly what they are going to be like. All I expect is for them to do a little reading around the subjects which was freely available. Yet we got Alan thick and seemly boasting about the matter and a dire attempt at satire with a fake Korean coverage. The amount of research they have done seemed to extend only to sterotypical football. I wouldn’t be surprised if they still think that Holland are playing Total Football and that Germany will grind out every game with true efficient style.
I hope that blog entries like these coupled with the complaints that people have sent really get home to some of these producers and pundits and that we see something a little better for the European Championships and even the Premiership.
Excellent piece.
Julian – I had the exact same reply to a complaint. Mine was about how during one match (a pretty rubbish one it has to be said) Mick McCarthy said that he hoped someone would elbow someone because he was bored.
I’ve re-complained (is that a word?).
I would agree with all said about the BBC and ITV pundits.
Here in Ireland we have a very lively bunch of experts in the studio, including ex Liverpool players Ronnie Whealan, Didi Harmann and Graeme Souness, along side Ossie Ardiles, to mentions some and our main 3 pundits Eamon Dunphy, John Giles and Liam Brady. The difference is that these experts are allowed to say, he was crap, the team was crap, the manager is crap, the man conned the ref, the ref conned FIFA, etc.
It makes for a much better commentary by a country mile. Eamon Dunphy went to the South African institute for help with pronouncing the names of all African players at the tournament, and thanked them live on telly. John Giles tells it as it is, he enjoys the passing game of course, but is happy watching well organised sides as much.
Indeed all our pundits have some knowledge of some of the players, coaches etc.
There is banter of course, with Van Bommell being the end of much amusement last night for still being part of this tournament and indeed not having received a red card during much of this seasons CL.
The BBC pick Shearer, Hansen etc because they will not offend anyone watching the game, they do not need to be intelligent or witty, just very good at not offending anyone.
If you can get
Excellent old skool reference to David Pleat’s inability to pronounce Julian Joachim, think I remember that game too (fairly shortly after he’d stopped being Leicester manager in fact) & it being referred to in an issue of 90 Minutes shortly afterwards.
Pleat’s classic is surely Chimbomber instead of Chimbomba!
The sad thing is that he still does it and that no one at the BBC has had the temerity to correct him off air. Presumably either the producers don’t listen to the commentary themselves or they just don’t care about accuracy.
He’s got me doing it now! Chimbonda!
In reference to a point made by LardyBoyMark, it reminded me of something mentioned by Messrs Kuper and Szymanski in ‘Why England Lose’ and it comes back to a class issue. The vast majority of English/British footballers are working class. The vast majority (I can’t think of any who aren’t) of English/British pundits/summarisers are ex-footballers. Therefore one can say that the pundits are of a working class background and presumably uneducated.
Their lack of education may be extended into a lack of scholastic work-ethic, which this sort of work requires. It comes as no surprise when foreign pundits like Patrick Vieira and Jurgen Klinsmann this year, and the likes of Leonardo in previous years, offer a far more pertinent insight and a more informed one. Much like being back at school, intelligence and a desire to learn is frowned upon by the majority of your peers, and it seems so in this industry too – as pointed out in this very article.
The commentators, on the other hands, are journalists with qualifications and vast experience – they know how vital research is to being good at their job, and are keen to do it. The difference between being there and earning it and being there because of your name could not be more apparent.
Things won’t change until pundits are hired from outside of football, or until British football accepts more from the middle classes. However, it goes without saying that this isn’t a blanket statement, and there are pundits worth listening to who come from the same areas I’ve just criticised – Gareth Southgate, perhaps. The cheese to Kevin Keegan’s chalk if you will.
You’re an idiot. It has nothing to do with a ‘lack of scholastic work-ethic’ you tedious dullard.
Klinnsmann, Leonardo and Viera offered no extra insight whatsoever.
Still if its made you feel all cosy to praise foreigners, and not only that but BLACK foreigners, then fair enough.
Still, it doesn’t stop what you wrote being ill informed snobbery.
The BBC have always got the same replies to complaints, which only lead to more complaints. There should be more journalists on the panels.
What a fantastic post, and I agree 100%!
John Giles a good pundit? The guy is a dinosaur. Tells it like it is? Listen to him again, you’d think he’d never saw a good game of Football in his life. The guy was a thug on the pitch when he played. The guy is awful. If you think the beeb don’t do their research, listen to him! Roll on…
Guy’s, yes, the beeb are woeful, paid for by the public, but try tuning into RTE. Think yourselves lucky….
Lineker annoys me, possibly more than all the others. Why is he there? He offers nothing except sanctimonious frowning, template fawning over players or teams that have already been anointed by even the world’s slowest media and demonstrating his piss-weak attempts at wit with that super-dry delivery that merits much better material. He thinks he’s Oscar Wilde, but with the brain of Kim Wilde. When was the last time you heard something original coming from his mouth? Its like he looks at tabloid headlines from the last two years and edits them into a couple of sentences.
Then again, an anchor for the BBC is never going to really be anything else, but I tire of Gary Lineker, and the other idiots. Go with Martin Keown, he is a pundit who does actually sound like he knows what he’s talking about. Lee Dixon is ok too, Adrian Chiles is infintely better as an anchor, genuinely funny and intelligent and I don’t care that he wasn’t a player, I don’t watch MOTD for some ill-informed opinions of smug over-inflated ex-players; unfortunately that’s what we get.
I watched England v Slovenia, and it was preceeded by a weird and slightly dirty segment of Lineker and Shearer sitting alone in a darkened cinema, watching clips of their finest moments as England internationals complete with cringe-worthy script “Should have gone down there” “Nah mate, that’s not my game” AAAaaaggggggghhhhh! I don’t know how long it went for, I hit FFWD right after that line, but I’ll never get that time back.
Like the perenial failures of the actual England WC team, like the spoilt, entitled laziness of a lot of English players, like the quality of the media in the UK in general and the rise of appaulingly boring celebrity reality TV, like a thousand other problems, in my view it’s symptomatic of a root cause that is rotting our country:
Britain’s obsession with celebrity.
First of all, fantastic article.
I think what has griped us the most as the games have come thick and fast, little things you pick up become more prominent. What I find outstanding is the fact that either commentators pronounce a name wrong, or just get a player mixed up with another player. If I can notice these mistakes just from watching football as a hobby, how can the paid professionals get it wrong?
It terms of the the ‘analysts’ its frightening that Harry Redknapp is a manager, and Alan Shearer (was).
Anybody who has had the pleasure of listening to TMS knows that the BBC can get it right, if they treat the viewer as an informed viewer.
What a great read , I have been thinking this throughout the tourny, I enjoyed Viera , Seedorf and Adebayor etc but Shearer ????? he is an embarresment on TV , please , no more , I beg you , Motson and Hansen can also leave the building , poor form from all these guys but Shearer is easily the worst
Iain, I take it you read Tom English’s piece in the Scotsman a couple of weeks back? Hits on quite a few of the same points. Here it is if you haven’t read it:
http://www.scotsman.com/tom-english/Tom-English-39The-level-of.6364084.jp
Hopefully someone somewhere is taking notice.
Bang on with everything you say. I’ve given up on the pundits completely now. If they don’t take the games seriously, why even listen to them?
As for commentators, check out the BBC DVDs of classic FA Cup finals. The difference between a David Coleman commentary circa 1970 where he would go for large stretches of the match only mentioning the name of the player with the ball and a modern day stream of gibberish and feeble jokes is like night and day. And his approach worked just fine.
Greig, you’re talking my language. David Coleman was the best football commentator of the lot. He wasn’t bad at athletics either.
The reason? Sheer enthusiasm. You can hear the excitement in his voice as the tension of the game/race builds. It’s pure magic.
Today’s surly commentators and pundits are earning ten times what Coleman ever did. It’s a crying shame.
I’m surprised that in the comments above that nobody really refers to the lack of knowledge from any pundits (BBC, ITV, RTE) and many of the media (including print) about the laws of the game. I do know the laws of the game, I do know that merely because a ‘player has played the ball’ that a tackle can still be a foul. It doesn’t matter at all if he plays the ball if he fouls whilst doing so – not one of the commentators or pundits covering the World Cup seems to know this and all of them possess an extraordinary lack of knowledge about the laws of the game (and, indeed tactics)
Is this just one piece of ignorance about the laws and am I getting petty about an oft-repeated inaccuracy? Not at all, there are several examples in every game –
‘The foul started outside the penalty area’. Er…the law states that a penalty is given for where the foul ends not where it starts (so long as it’s 1 foul, not 2 separate offences, but even that would be too much for Messrs Hansen and Shearer to get thier collective brain cells around)
‘He has to get a red card…he was the last man’. The ‘last man rule’ so beloved of Shearer doesn’t actually exist in the laws (and by the way, it’s only a red card if the attacking player is moving directly towards the goal – not vaguely towards. He must be heading towards the goal)
There are scores of other inaccuracies I could quote, but life is too short
Why do I have a particular bug-bear about this stream of inaccuracies, for which the BBC are the largest serial offenders, although far from being alone?
Simple – the media inform people. If a law is quoted on Match Of The Day or in a newspaper, the general public take it as gospel that the pundit or journalist must know the rules of the game and thereby an injustice may have been done, or a law has been broken or the referee has made a mistake. After all, surely these pundits know better than a fully qualified referee with years of officiating experience (and, yes, refs do make mistakes, we all do – just nowhere near as many as these ‘professional’ commentators make)
It’s not just an occasional mistake on these programmes, either – nearly every law of the game that is referred to in commentary or discussed between the pundits in the studio is quoted incorrectly. In most cases, these are not slight inaccuracies but gross misrepresentations of the laws of the game
We should expect more from our media – their job is to inform as well as to entertain (and I’m sorry, Iain, but most press are guilty of this as well). How can we fully understand the intricacies of football and its laws if they do not inform us in a correct, factual manner. If the pundits are wrong, then the general public are misinformed, but will repeat these inaccuracies as facts verbatim
Following the World Cup Final, I’ll be writing a blog about the media’s ignorance regarding laws (and also, don’t get me started, on basic tactics as well) and if I’m allowed I will post the link here
One thing that annoys me about the pundits is the attitude that if it isn’t Premier League then it can’t be worth spending time on.
As an example when Shearer and Hansen (both complete cocks by the way) talk about the Bundesliga as an inferior league they haven’t actually watched a Bundesliga game which would at least give them some sort of reference point. All they see of the Bundesliga is Bayern Munich in Europe … they wouldn’t have a clue who plays, say, left midfield for Hoffenheim, and whether he is a good player or not.
Pundits should have a clause written into their contracts that they must watch a handful of games involving at least one team outside the top five from five different leagues every week.
Until then I will continue to take pundits’ comments as an insult to my intelligence.
We’re lucky in Ireland – we have RTE! Newspaper report on punditry.
The Irish Times – Thursday, June 24, 2010Ossie reveals his secret to success – the ball was his ‘lubber’
COUCH: Ossie Ardiles is fast approaching legendary status as he weaves his magic on RTÉ, writes MARY HANNIGAN
DAY 13. Too many highlights so far to mention, but it’ll be hard to top Ossie Ardiles’ concern that Argentina’s defence would be their “Achilles tendon” when they come up against stiffer opposition. He’s not the first football man, mind you, to muddle his body parts; it was David O’Leary, after all, who once complained that Aston Villa’s inability to defend set-pieces was “the Achilles’ heel that has been stabbing us in the back”.
Ossie’s contributions to the RTÉ panel are now approaching legendary status, and by the time he’s done you can be sure there’ll be nothing you don’t know about South American football.
For example, we now understand why the ball appeared to be an extension of Ossie’s foot in his rather splendid playing days.
“The ball was my lubber, I went to bed with it, it was everything,” he explained. John Giles and Graeme Souness said nothing, certainly not “the ball was my lubber”. Both men, no doubt, loved the roundy thing, but just not that much.
Steven Gerrard, rest assured, lubs the ball too, but having been stuck out on the left by Fabio Capello he just hasn’t seen a whole lot of it.
And you know what they say, absence makes the heart grow fonder. Stevie has, evidently, been pining for a more central role.
Well, Gary Lineker had good news for the English nation yesterday, telling them the BBC’s sources had reliably informed him Stevie would be playing through the middle against Slovenia, “at the head of the diamond”.
Gary, the two Als, Hansen and Shearer, and Lee Dixon then based their entire pre-match analysis on their source’s disclosure, which was unfortunate because the information was thoroughly incorrect.
Roy Hodgson tried to warn them, insisting Stevie would, most probably, play on the left, but Lee Dixon hoped, trusted and prayed he was wrong.
“If he’s playing on the left today we should all pack up and go home,” he sighed.
Match time. Stevie on the left. Lee dusting down his rucksack. But wait, goal. England. Up and running?
Half-time. Fantasy World Cup Punditry, all of them in the one studio. Ready?
Hansen: “Once England got the goal the confidence levels surged, they were excellent.”
Eamon Dunphy: “They just didn’t grow in confidence at all after the goal.”
Lineker: “The goal really settled them, didn’t it? They pushed on from there.”
Ronnie Whelan: “You’d think they’d have kicked on from when they scored, but they actually got worse.”
Roy: “England’s crossing has been absolutely outstanding.”
Giles: “Some of the crossing was just awful.”
Shearer: “Rooney looks more confident, he’s getting around the pitch a lot better.”
Dunphy: “It’s shocking to see Rooney so subdued, he’s been reduced to a shivering wreck.”
Shearer: “They look much more comfortable on the ball, they’re passing it with a purpose, with pace, they’re closing down – a much better performance, it’s encouraging.”
Giles: “They’re much better than they have been, but they couldn’t have been worse.”
No arguments, then. Second half. England held on. Full-time. Ready?
Lee Dixon: “A great performance.”
Dunphy: “Shocking . . . absolutely incredibly bad . . . pretty awful stuff.”
Hansen: “The commitment was there, the spirit was there, the enterprise was there, the creativity was there, they passed it better – they could have scored five or six quite easily. Capello will obviously be delighted with the performance.”
Giles: “If that’s the shackles off what’ll they be like when the shackles are back on?”
’Arry Redknapp: “We played with pace, we got after them, we pressed them, there wasn’t a weakness in the team.”
Dunphy: “They were astonishingly poor.”
Lineker: “He looked more like the Rooney we know.”
Ronnie: “Rooney is a major worry, his form, his body language, his demeanour, everything.”
Dixon: “Gerrard was outstanding.”
Dunphy: “I can’t believe how bad Gerrard was today.”
’Arry: “Across midfield we were top drawer.”
Giles: “Barry got worse as the game went on, Milner, Gerrard and Lampard the same.”
’Arry: “Bring it on! Whoever we play we’ll be difficult to beat.”
Ronnie: “If they don’t improve they’ll go straight out, it was a very, very inept performance.”
The consensus ended, though, when Capello appeared on our screens for a chat with Gabby Logan.
The BBC was euphoric about Fabio’s euphoria, but Giles reckoned he was just spoofin’. “It wasn’t exactly the most probing interview,” said Darragh Moloney. “Well she seems a very attractive girl – maybe that’s why she’s doing the interview, she was doing a good bit of creeping there,” said Gilesie. Next time he meets his former Leeds team-mate Terry Yorath – that’d be Gabby’s Da – he should bring a gumshield.
Germany v Ghana v Australia v Serbia. Okay, hands up, we missed most of the games. But how often do you get a tennis match that appears intent on never ending? The tennis ball was John Isner and Nicolas Mahut’s lubber, they just never wanted to say goodbye.
Good article that encapsulates something that has been evident for many years. It is about time the BBC had a big clear out. The current format is so stale and the AH/AL/AS/GL clique reminds me of my first day at work in a factory where the old boys ruled the roost and their mere presence was intimidating to newcomers. I too was surprised that Seedorf became a little overawed. As for Adebayor it might as well have been Gazza because I struggled to understand what he was saying. My main gripe is their complete ignorance of football outside of the Premiership, including the Championship, but particularly highlighted by anything South American or Asian. No more was this highlighted by the contributions of Jurgen Klinsman who showed his knowledge to be extensive and incisive. Far from being intimidated by the ‘Musketeers’ I am sure I saw a sneer or two at their comments.
Roy Hodgson, whilst also showing a degree of ‘Establishment’ about him, also showed how he has managed to have such a varied career all over the world.
The clear out should not stop there by the way. I for one have been amazed for many years at the adulation given to’ Motty’ who besides knowing a lot of statistics has an utter incomprehension of how a ball roles let alone how to kick it. There are a number of more adept commentators out there and it is about time JM was put out to grass.
The analyst position is in most cases so lacking in anything worthwhile as to be irrelevant. The insight of contributions from Martin Keown and Mark Bright show that there is a place for ex pro’s but the ‘know it all’ style of Mick McCarthy and Mark Lawrenson (again) is quite simply insulting.
Finally I give you David Pleat an incompetent bordering on lunacy. A grey suit and a job at the FA is surely beckoning.