Skip to content
January 26, 2011 / Iain Macintosh

Keys Self-Destructs. AND IT WAS LIVE!!!

I heard the on-air resignation of Dave Lee Travis in 1993, I had Radio 4 on in my kitchen when their presenters got Jeremy Hunt‘s surname wrong. Twice. They were gorgeous moments of aural splendour, but they were nothing compared to the breathless, runaway train crash that was Richard Keys defending himself on TalkSport. It takes two grown men the better part of a day to dig a grave. Keys managed it in less than an hour.

The timing was immaculate. Just as people were beginning to feel sorry for him and his partner in slime, Andy Gray, just at the tipping point between the righteous indignation of the British people and their natural inclination to back the underdog, Keys stepped in to send the scales crashing to the floor. If only he’d turned up, sat down, said sorry and then stopped talking, he might have gotten away with it. Gargh! If it hadn’t been for that meddling ego!

Everything was someone else’s fault. The fault of the press. The fault of ‘dark forces,’ the fault of those who knew that ‘success breeds envy.’ He lashed at out Rio Ferdinand, claiming that his sources had told him of far worse comments in the Manchester United dressing room. He poured scorn on the idea that he genuinely believed women had no place in football, putting his comments down to that awful word, ‘banter.’ He compared the leaked tapes to phone-tapping, he reminded us of the many women whose careers he had aided. He said that he was worried about Sian Massey and that’s why he praised her so much at half-time. He repeatedly apologised and repeatedly followed it up with more desperate self-justification.

This wasn’t ‘I’m sorry,‘ this was, ‘I’m sorry, but…’ It was frustrating to listen to. And yet we agreed on one thing.

When I saw a determined-looking Massey striding out of the tunnel at Molineux, I was worried as well. Don’t get me wrong. I read The Guardian, I’m partial to a good bowl of muesli, but I’m not so politically correct that the sight of a woman in a Premier League game doesn’t still catch my eye. Unless, of course, it’s Nani. I’m used to her now.

I wasn’t worried because I had pig-headedly assumed she’d just turned up from John Lewis, dropped her shopping bags and picked up the prettiest flag. She’s a qualified official, for Christ’s sake, she knows more about the offside rule than you and I combined. No, I was worried because I feared that any mistake she might make, and all referee’s assistants make at least one mistake a game, would be seized upon by the fans, the viewers and the media. I was worried because the bit of me that still opens doors for ladies and would never dream of saying Jeremy’s new surname in their company, feared for the way she‘d be treated. This, in itself, is probably sexist, but that‘s let’s not go down that road today. Anyway, I scribbled her name down (because I was writing a feature on the game for my employers, not because I’m creepy) and hoped that by the end of the match I’d be one of the few who could remember it. Didn’t quite work out like that, did it?

So let‘s get this out of the way. The comments about Massey were indefensible. If you’re the face of football and you’re caught expressing your belief that no woman can understand the offside law, you deserve to take a pasting. It wasn’t banter, it wasn’t ironic and I fail to see how, as Richard Keys so memorably claimed, that it was designed to calm debutant pundit Matt Murray. If vicious sexism is a sedative, what about any other kind of prejudice? How about nailing the gypsies next week? Will that slow the heart-rate?

The comments were dark, they were mean and they were desperately wide of the mark. What was even more shocking was that two men so influential in their industry could genuinely hold the view that women don’t understand it. There are more than enough first class female journalists and broadcasters out there to disprove that theory and, though the sight of a female official here is still rare, surely they know that it is commonplace elsewhere.

Andy Gray and Richard Keys should have been hauled over the coals, given a public bollocking, been forced to make a full and contrite apology and then been allowed to salvage what remained of their reputation. As Gareth Southgate said this week, the incident will actually boost the standing of women in football, so why not have them there as long-standing reminders that the game must be inclusive?

But Gray was taken down by other tapes, the release of which looks like an obvious hatchet job. Some of them weren’t even controversial. If it’s a sackable offence to stand with your mates and weigh up whether someone is sexually attractive or not then I’m first against the wall, I’m afraid. SmashGate, the brief, but impressively toe-curling footage of Keys discussing Jamie Redknapp’s ex-girlfriend, was nothing. If you leave four men in a room for long enough, they’ll say a lot worse than this. God knows I have.

The other tape, the Charlotte Jackson incident, was harder to judge. It could have been good-natured banter within the boundaries of a friendship. It could also have been sexual harassment. Before the TalkSport interview, there was no way to know. I was even beginning to feel sorry for Keys and Gray. Who was trying to destroy them? What did any of this have to do with their ability to do their job?

Keys’ simple comment, ’Charlotte can take care of herself,’ ended the argument at a stroke. That doesn’t sound like a friendship to me. That doesn’t sound like messing around with your mate at work. If someone alleges sexual harassment or bullying, you don’t pass it off by saying that they can handle it. With that one glib comment, it was all over. It has been reported that Keys and Gray are arrogant. After this, it was hard to argue.

Keys will lose his job. That much is inevitable now. He won’t lose it because he said mean things about Massey. He’ll lose it because he still doesn’t understand why what he did was wrong. He apologised for everything, even the things he didn’t need to apologise for, thereby cheapening the original sentiment. He tried to fight allegations of arrogance by being more arrogant. In attempting to destroy the story, he has succeeded only in making a much bigger story. Why did Sky let him do it? Perhaps, as journalist Dan Brennan suggested, they knew precisely how badly he’d screw it up. Perhaps they just wanted him to finish himself off.

There will be much celebration in the offices of TalkSport this evening. This was their finest hour and you’ll be able to hear corks popping from a ten mile radius. It won’t be the same at the Keys residence. The only thing that anyone should hear from there is the scratching of a pen on a letter of resignation.

 

 

46 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Simon Head / Jan 26 2011 4:11 pm

    Top stuff Iain. Can’t disagree on any of the above. The big story now though isn’t so much the sexism issue – the reaction of the public has suggested that times have moved on and standards of equality have improved – but how all this came to the public awareness.

    As you say, it smacks of a hatchet job, and the reasons why could prove to be an even bigger story than this.

  2. Daryl Booth / Jan 26 2011 4:15 pm

    Great article. Pretty much spot on. Sky have cleverly (but for the wrong reasons I suspect) let Keys fall on his own sword.

    I can only hope that sky use this brief window of opportunity to replace both these fools with a younger more intelligent pairing. Dare I say, even a woman?
    Daryl

  3. Lee Cash / Jan 26 2011 4:22 pm

    Exceptionally well-written, thoroughly comprehensive snapshot of what is truly a baffling media debacle. Keys will go, and so he should. Yes; most men make off-colour remarks about the fairer sex, but only a buffoon does it with recording equipment within ten miles of their “banter”.

  4. James Heal / Jan 26 2011 4:27 pm

    I wonder if this whole scandal will provoke change. Change to the offside rule, maybe….

    I await the new Keys/Gray TalkSport show.

    PS Nice Martin Tyler reference there, Iain.

  5. The Infamous Bookmaker / Jan 26 2011 4:36 pm

    The strange thing about the interviews was that 99% was devoted to Massey and 1% to his Redknapp comments which were in my opinion so much worse. Making a joke about offside rules is one thing but referring to a woman as “IT” and the terminology he used was despicable.

    So anyway, it turns out if you give someone enough rope… the old adage is true!

  6. splittter / Jan 26 2011 4:37 pm

    Think most of this is spot on, but I do think there’s a difference between discussing how attractive someone is and using phrases like “smashed it” & “hanging out the back of”. I also think that there’s a difference between having that kind of discussion amongst friends and having it publicly at work. It’s obviously a hatchet job, and you can bet whoever is behind it has motives other than combating sexism, but the offenses in each of the videos would merit dismissal on their own if I were in charge at Sky.

  7. Shane Thomas / Jan 26 2011 4:38 pm

    Given that this has been an incredibly fluid story since Sunday morning, this is one of the most even-handed pieces I’ve read. It’s easy to allow one’s understandable outrage to leak into one’s writing, but this is a very astute observation of the furore so far. I say “so far” as I think this story still has legs.

  8. Chris / Jan 26 2011 4:53 pm

    Problem with the SmashGate description is there more than likely to have been female producers/production assistants, engineers, runners etc either in the studio or listening in to the feed as it was prepared for broadcast. They knew the mics were on, it’s standard practice. It was depressingly pathetic and degenerate “banter”. It was a work environment, not a lad’s hotel room on holiday in Benidorm.

  9. Mike / Jan 26 2011 4:57 pm

    I think their sexist and biggetted comments are disgusting and have absolutely no place in the modern world. I think its only right that they lose the privelage of their jobs and their jobs should be given to a woman………………. Preferably one with big boobies!

  10. Fernando / Jan 26 2011 5:07 pm

    Well said sir.

    As powerful as they both were, they are now finding out that treating everyone as beneath you has its consequences.

  11. Peter Ricci / Jan 26 2011 5:32 pm

    Incisive, witty, ascerbic and probably the best written article/blog on the subject to date. Well done.

  12. Tom Huelin / Jan 26 2011 5:41 pm

    Brilliant summary of the last 2 days news!! Keys hung, drawn and quartered by himself in the end. Did sky make him do it to hang himself, or did keys go on there of his own accord to express his frustration and basically announce his resignation before he was fired?

    Either way, it’s all over to messers redknapp and shepherd now I feel.

  13. Simon / Jan 26 2011 5:50 pm

    This link has what will probably be the closest explanation as to why the have been (somewhat justifiably) the victims of a hatchet job; http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/01/sky-sports-keys-gray-melvin

  14. Molls / Jan 26 2011 5:53 pm

    I grew up and worked with morons like these – putting up with pathetic ‘banter’ on a daily basis. There was no one to complain to because the boss was as bad if not worse.

    I’m delighted Keys and Gray have been exposed. Maybe the female production team members had just about had enough of it?

    I have a feeling more may follow.

  15. Scott / Jan 26 2011 6:05 pm

    Having listened to the interview myself, I came to pretty similar conclusions. That said, I’m not convinced it’ll bring about Keys’ downfall, as the media reporting of his attitude has been somewhat mixed. For a little while, I wandered whether Kay Burley and Jon Desborough were talking about an entirely different interview, when this afternoon they discussed how Keys apologised and offered no excuses. Of course, there were also repeated claims about how – along with Gray – he has revolutionised football punditry.

  16. Scott / Jan 26 2011 6:18 pm

    A very interesting perspective on this from former Sky Sports employee:

    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/01/sky-sports-keys-gray-melvin

  17. Michael Richard / Jan 26 2011 6:53 pm

    Good stuff Iain. I was going to write an article on this interview but it will pail in comparison. I’ll just redirect everyone to your site

  18. Robert / Jan 26 2011 7:02 pm

    Richard Key’s and Andy Gray’s ‘offences’ were trivial and have been blown out of all proportion. The comments were jokes (in bad taste maybe, but so what) and not intended for public consumption. If they had stayed private i.e. whoever has it in for Gray & Keys had not leaked them, Sian Massey would have been totally unaffected by them.

    Richard Keys is a top notch presenter of football, getting the absolute maximum out of his guests, and Andy Gray is by far the best pundit in the business.

    I see my £60 per month investment in Sky as much lower value for money now that Gray and Keys have gone.

    Keys & Gray have made a significant contribution in building Sky’s business over the last 20 years yet the company has shown them zero loyalty at the time when they’ve made mistakes and need support.

    It’s been incredibly ugly seeing their colleagues (fellow journalists) coming out and kicking them while they’re down.

    • Iain Macintosh / Jan 26 2011 9:16 pm

      I respect your point of view, but I have to disagree. If someone is the face of a TV company’s sports coverage and they are revealed, privately or otherwise, to feel that a whole gender has no place on the touchline, it’s public interest and they deserve the kicking. I really don’t believe that they were joking. You laugh when you joke, or at least make an inflection in that direction. There was no laughter here, it was just mean.

      • Robert / Jan 26 2011 9:45 pm

        “Jokes” aren’t always funny – do you seriously believe that Gray and Keys thought that Sian Massey, a qualified referee working at a high level really didn’t know the offside rule?

        Of course they know she knows the rule – it was just a silly throwaway line – a “joke”.

  19. Calum / Jan 26 2011 7:04 pm

    Nice one Iain, your analysis of Keys’ suicidal hatchet job is spot on. He had absolutely no understanding of what he actually did. It seemed, at times, as though he thought that he was factually incorrect, saying things like ‘my comments were later shown to be wrong’. It was as if he thought he was in the wrong because this particular female official happened to understand the offside rule and showed no awareness of the wider context. Bizarre.

  20. Kipp9 / Jan 26 2011 7:43 pm

    The only thing that anyone should hear from there is the scratching of a pen on a letter of resignation.

    Biff & I get to add the 100th 5 star review to this excellent piece.

  21. Jon / Jan 26 2011 8:09 pm

    Disagree with most of the article, if not all of it.

    Keys and Gray have been stitched up. To lose their jobs over the remarks they made show how utterly ridiculous this country has become. I haven’t met a single woman that feels ‘offended’ and most cringe at how ‘politically correct’ some idiots are acting over the whole affair. And what a surprise to see the media leap all over it like a pack of dogs. They love bringing people down and this article is just another such example.

    The paid should have been reminded to keep such opinions to themselves – ironic really when they are paid for their opinions. It wasn’t even on air, it didn’t even warrant an apology. If the Assistant Referee had passed comment on Andy Gray being a rubbish pundit – because he’s a man – is she supposed to be sacked from her job? Do me a favour.

    These politically correct comments are an embarrassment.

    • Iain Macintosh / Jan 26 2011 9:19 pm

      If the assistant referee had said that men shouldn’t be on TV, or that Scotsmen shouldn’t comment on English football or that tubby 50-somethings had no place on the telly, then she’d get the same kicking that Gray got. Well, she would from me anyway.

  22. ShesABitOfALooker / Jan 26 2011 8:29 pm

    “…putting his comments down to that awful word, ‘banter.’ ” Fine article as a whole but sincere thanks for that line.

  23. twistedblood / Jan 26 2011 8:34 pm

    I agree with most of what you’ve written, Iain, and as always it’s a pleasure to read, but …

    “If it’s a sackable offence to stand with your mates and weigh up whether someone is sexually attractive or not then I’m first against the wall, I’m afraid.”

    … that’s not what he was doing. “Did you smash it?”; “Did you smash it?”; “Hanging out the back of it”. No weighing up of her attractiveness; no mark out of ten; no is she hot or not. She’s simply once, twice, three times an object.

    • Iain Macintosh / Jan 26 2011 9:23 pm

      In this case, I was referring to the Andy Burton clip, filmed on the touchline, where they discussed Massey’s appearance. I thought that was fairly harmless.

      As for Smashgate, yes, it’s objectifying women and no, it’s not very nice. But it’s not indicative of Keys’ views on football and who is allowed to officiate it. It’s indicative that he’s a strange kind of grown-up. That’s not a sackable offence. Well, it shouldn’t be.

      • twistedblood / Jan 26 2011 10:44 pm

        Ah, okay, apologies for misreading.

        I would say – and I think most HR departments in the country would agree – that being that kind of strange human being out loud in the workplace most certainly is a sacking offence.

      • Gollo / Jan 27 2011 8:43 am

        Agree with the article, but women objectify men too. By all accounts Anne Summers parties are one big penis related chat!!

  24. mike / Jan 26 2011 9:31 pm

    Actually, I feel sorry for Andy Gray. He works for Sky Sports for about 15 years talking total crap, then the first time he says something sensible, that we all agree with, he gets the bullet!!

  25. Andy / Jan 26 2011 10:07 pm

    Amazing piece.

  26. Graham In The Stand / Jan 26 2011 10:23 pm

    Nice to see someone actually take a bit more of a considered view on the sitution. I think that alot of the critisicm from people like Brady is a bit hypocritical though. Did you see her interview?

  27. Simon / Jan 26 2011 10:44 pm

    You make (some) accurate assertions, and I reiterate the ‘some’ in that sentence. Yes Keys self destructed from a PR perspective, yes he should not have made some of the defences he made (comparing the situation to tapping phones a particular mistake).

    However for me a bigger crime committed than Keys or Gray combined is the opportunism, smugism nd general self righteousness of the media or in this case gossip bloggers. Take a step back and see if you can accurately and with appropriate knowledge label Keys as ‘arrogant’. Is a 1 hour interview where someone speaks honestly and from the heart evidence of arrogance? Should the fact Keys doesn’t have a PR adviser something to sniff at PR celebrate – surely honesty is wha a free society’s journalism should be immersed in?

    Yet again it’s the media, or individual article writers such as yourself, who have shamed Britain in this instance – not one man’s misguided, stupid and yes offensive mistake.

    You sir, are part of the problem as much as you like to laud yourself as the solution.

    • Iain Macintosh / Jan 26 2011 11:01 pm

      Hang on a tick. I’ve shamed Britain? I think you grossly overestimate my influence, my friend. On my best day, I’d do well to shame a Tesco Metro. And I should know, I’ve tried.

      If I label Keys as arrogant it’s because I think he came across as arrogant. If I say he ‘is reported to be arrogant,’ it’s because I’ve seen him reported to be arrogant. I think that’s pretty accurate. If you don’t think he’s arrogant, then that’s fair enough. I completely respect your view.

      And yes, it’s lovely that he doesn’t have a PR advisor. It certainly made my afternoon.

      Finally, I don’t recall lauding myself as the solution. If I’m the solution, I dread to think what the problem is. Probably something to do with uneaten donuts, I’d wager.

      • Danielle Warren / Jan 27 2011 1:33 pm

        Well said! I had similar comments after writing about the two of them making me out to be the bad guy as well. I think some people like to point out anything to try and get some attention. I don’t think you’ve “shamed” anyone.

  28. blackwatertown / Jan 26 2011 11:07 pm

    Bad behaviour for sure, but also interesting how they’ve been stitched up for it. Suggests there is not a whole lot of love for them amongst their production colleagues, which is interesting.
    Bit of an awkward time for Gray to be taking action against News International for alleged phone hacking too.
    Anyone heard more on the twitters rumours that he’ll be replaced by a woman? Namely one Kirsty Gallacher?

  29. azim / Jan 27 2011 5:14 am

    Whats the diff between what these were doing in the videos and that of Jeremy Clarkson? Some of them were pretty funny, deplorable but funny. There’s one one youbook which he mimes grabbing “a birds tits”. Shouldn’t be laughing when he did it, but there I was chuckling my pants off-as were the the girl and the audience

    How is football different from other forms of entertainment that it merits such indignation when such views were express off the cuff.

    • Iain Macintosh / Jan 27 2011 7:49 am

      I’m starting to suspect that people are filling in the comments box before reading the article.

      Have another read. I’ve been quite clear on the fact that, in my own meritless opinion, two of the videos are harmless. The Andy Burton tape is just blokes being blokes. The SmashGate tape is just blokes being filthy blokes. Neither do their stars much credit, but nor are they sackable offences.

      The original audio tape features two of football’s most recognisable voices making deplorable comments about a female official on the basis that she’s female. It’s not banter, it’s not a joke, it’s just nasty.

      The Charlotte Jackson tape could be anywhere between friends messing around and genuine sexual harrassment. You’ll notice, I’m sure, that Jackson isn’t laughing.

  30. Colm Smyth / Jan 27 2011 9:13 am

    A well balanced bit of writing, Iain. I agree that some of the videos weren’t so bad, the touch-line one of Gray discussing how fit she is, for example. All guys do that.

    But the other video/audio of ‘smashing it’ and the ‘do us a favour’ ones were certainly not well natured or ‘banter.’ If that is banter, then I have been doing it wrong all along. What kind of a word is ‘smash’ to use in that context?

    Yesterday was a glorious landmark moment of car crash radio. I admit that I have hated Keys for years because, much like Stuart Robson, he always made snide comments about Arsenal. I liked Gray on commentary, though wasn’t so keen on his view that his job was to represent the Premier League brand rather than just tell it like it is.

    Looking forward to the discussion on today’s podcast!

  31. Danielle Warren / Jan 27 2011 1:30 pm

    Very good read Iain. They definitely did themselves no favors by opening their mouths post-debacle. And I completely agree that Keys seems clueless as to what he did wrong. They still believe this kind of behavior is OK.

    Hopefully this does continue to elevate the status of female officials, as so far she’s done a better job than a lot of men lately (can we take a look at her perfect call for Torres’ goal against Wolves and compare that to the linesman who wrongly ruled Torres offside for his goal against Fulham?)

    I had my own say about the incident http://fortheloveoffootball.net/2011/01/25/women-and-football-the-legacy-of-andy-gray/ trying to give a woman’s perspective if you want to read. Great post!

  32. Matt the Shrimp / Jan 27 2011 2:07 pm

    Ah, the things that the unsporty boys (Keys) will do to try and fit in with the sporty boys (Jamie, Souey etc), eh?

    I agree that the touchline incident had all but nothing to it, other than to highlight the underlying misogyny of Andy Gray (something which a casual glance at his private life would have told you about). The sheer humourlessness of all of his responses tells you of the scant regard in which he holds women.

    However, the other two clips which emerged – Gray’s “tuck this in, Charlotte”, and Keys’ “smash it” – are wholly unacceptable in modern society. It’s trite and, crucially, wrong to dismiss either of those comments with the lament that the modern, “PC-types” are invading the last bastion of male unreconstructivism. If I expressed sentiments like those in my job, I would be carpeted. It’s simply unacceptable to express comments like that in the workplace (as others have pointed out, what you might get away with saying in the pub is light years away from how you might behave at work) – and it’s their failure to realise that which has rendered their positions untenable.

    Of course, there’s a difference between whether it was morally and, from the point of view of PR, presentationally right to get rid of them (unquestionably so, in my view); and, whether, legally it was right to do so. I guess it’ll all turn on whether each is guilty of gross misconduct. I can’t say I’d be surprised if tidy settlements were quietly paid at some point next year.

    Great piece, though, Iain.

    Matt

    PS Para 6, line 3 – it should be “you & me”; it’s the object, not the subject of the verb. Sorry mate, SZ habits die hard…

Trackbacks

  1. 2010/2011 Season Thread - Page 471 - aberdeen-music
  2. Dark forces « Mike Whalley
  3. Top Posts — WordPress.com
  4. Sexism - Page 7 - Pet Forums Community
  5. Why Football needs female refs – Part 2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers

%d bloggers like this: