Don’t Blame Benitez
This is going to be a crap column. Sorry. The conclusions derived from its content are as wayward as a Paul Konchesky cross, the gags here aren’t good enough to compete with the likes of Barney Ronay and the cadence, well that’s just all over the place, the place, the place. It’s not my fault though. It’s the fault of my predecessor. Sure, I hit the keyboard and made the words, but the last bloke? Well, he was just awful.
Does that make sense? Well, it makes as much sense as blaming Rafa Benitez for Liverpool’s miserable start to the season. After all, Roy Hodgson signed three of the men who failed against Everton, and that number would have been higher had it not been for the unavoidable absence of Christian Poulsen. But ignoring personnel, shape, style and logic, pundits have been lining up to pin it all on the deposed Spaniard, poring over his failures with glee, pausing only to shine spotlights at Ryan Babel while bellowing, “£11.5m! What the hell was he thinking?” at passers-by.
I am no apologist for Benitez. The day after he left Anfield, I wrote a column that began with the words, “Rafa Benitez deserved to be sacked.” The very next day a number of angry emails arrived, the majority of which were typed in block capitals. But I stand by my point.
Liverpool hadn’t just finished 7th, they had been bombed out of the Champions League in a group stage seeded for their benefit. To make matters worse, they were knocked out of the FA Cup by Reading. At home. In a replay. They only qualified for the Europa League because the Football Association refused to run the risk of Portsmouth having their credit card refused at the airport. By any criteria, with the best will in the world, this was the most disastrous season Liverpool had experienced since the Souness era. Two decades ago, it would have meant the bullet. In these hysterical times it’s only a wonder Benitez wasn’t sacked sooner.
Not that he had much of a chance by the end. He was doomed the moment it emerged his American paymasters had been hitching up their skirts and whistling provocatively at Jurgen Klinsmann. Undermined and humiliated, he was a dead man walking. To make matters worse, the ruinous interest repayments from the deceitful leveraged buy-out robbed him of the ability to strengthen his squad. His final acquisitions were signed for transfer fees that wouldn’t have looked out of place in Kenny Dalglish’s day. But the damage was done before the arrival of Tom Hicks and George Gillett.
Benitez was never able to lift Liverpool to a level where they could consistently challenge the big guns. Xabi Alonso and Luis Garcia were superb early signings. Pepe Reina, a year later, was even better. Fernando Torres, not so obviously brilliant as people now make out, arrived in 2007, as did the disagreeable, but effective Javier Mascherano. Five players who would have challenged for a place in the Manchester United first team. Where are the others? Daniel Agger, Dirk Kuyt, Peter Crouch and Alvaro Arbeloa were all good professionals, but as Yossi Benayoun proved this summer, Liverpool’s better players would only be worth a place on Chelsea’s bench.
In erring in the transfer market, Benitez is hardly alone. But he did have an advantage that only a handful of other managers in England shared. He never had to deal with players demanding moves to bigger clubs. He never lost his stars to the European elite. He always had money to spend and, regardless of what Sir Alex Ferguson thinks, there has always been value in the transfer market. And, until the arrival of Hicks and Gillett, he had time. Time enough to forge a squad better than the one that finished seventh. Time enough to build a squad that could have been better insulated against the changing conditions.
Nevertheless, he is a fine manager. The Liverpool side that triumphed in Istanbul were comfortably the worst set of players to lift that trophy since Steaua Bucharest in 1986. Gerard Houllier was right. They were, for the most part, his team and he’s welcome to them. It will be many years before players as mediocre as Igor Biscan and Milan Baros bat so far beyond their average. Benitez won that trophy though, driving his team through the knock-out rounds with tactics that frustrated and defeated some of Europe’s biggest names. He did it the hard way and deserves his place in history. The last tilt at the title was impressive as well, especially given that Torres, regarded by some as one of only two decent players in the side, was absent for so much of the season. In the end though, Benitez couldn’t keep it up. His squad wasn’t good enough to win the title. Or challenge for it. They were good enough to finish seventh.
Which brings us back to Hodgson. He did not inherit relegation fodder. He inherited a seventh placed team. He added some names, he shed a few. He imposed his tactics and his ideals. It takes time to change the mentality of a club, but Hodgson has moved quickly. In a matter of months he has taken under-performing disappointments and turned them into screamingly awful empty shirts. This isn’t entirely his fault. He has endured as many distractions and pitfalls as his predecessor. But it is his responsibility.
Blaming Benitez isn’t just wrong, it’s self-destructive. It obscures the real reasons for Liverpool’s problems. It provides an excuse for failure and footballers rarely need to be asked twice to take one of those. Liverpool are crap because they play crap football. Granted, they haven’t played glorious football since the days of Roy Evans, but good God in heaven, they were never this bad. They lump the ball artlessly into the sky and hope that when it comes down, it lands somewhere near Torres. If that doesn’t work, they try it again. And again. And again.
Liverpool are crap because their well-remunerated players are offering up crap performances. Steven Gerrard can pass the ball far more accurately than he did on Sunday. Joe Cole can be more incisive, more daring and more dangerous. Lucas is a decent player, he really, really is. But he wasn’t this weekend. The list of despair goes on and on and on and on. These men need to stand up, take a look at the badge on their shirt and realise that they cannot continue to be so second-rate.
But tactics and motivation are the province of the manager. Not last season’s manager, the current manager. Hodgson has had to deal with boardroom uncertainty and a home crowd who were never entirely sure about him in the first place. This was not an easy assignment and I don’t envy him it for a moment. But it is his job.
For finishing seventh last season, blame Benitez. For bobbing about in the relegation zone, blame Hodgson. This isn’t politics, you can’t blame everything on the previous administration. Liverpool need to face up to the real reasons for their failure.

I’d still aim more ammo at the players and the deluded fans…
Good piece.
Can’t argue with that Iain, the only thing I do blame Benitez for after his exit is the legacy he has left at the club, basically a three man team now, Torres, Reina and Gerrard are the only players with real top level quality, Gerrard of course was already there, with the amount of money he spent surely there should be more quality left at the club, not a team with 2 strikers one of which is only good enough to be maybe a 4th choice at any top club (the other is Ngog *joke*).
You just have to look at the legacy that Mourinho left at Chelsea and now at the Inter team that Rafa has adopted, I feel a little sorry for Roy, the team is not that strong and is very light in depth, however as you said they should be much better than the position they are in.
Hodgson has failed tactically, against Birmingham for 84 minutes the system didn’t work but nothing was done, the smallest of tweek could make all the difference, but he decided with 6 minutes to go that he’d make a change, it was the same again today, everyone could see Liverpool were failing, moving Gerrard deeper was never going to work, he seems out of his depth.
I can’t see the new board giving him much longer.
Benitez did not build on any of his success but I agree he cant be blamed for the start of the current campaign. I would look at the Carragher & Gerrard no longer being the top class players they once were. Torres doesn’t look fit or happy.
Does not look like Roy can change things & might be changed instead.
It’s all about blaming someone. Owner, Rafa, Roy, players. Who next? Fair to Roy, he still got media and time to turnaround (only god know how long). But for Rafa, he is gone. It’s not fair talk about legacy, if Roy put Liverpool at top of the league now, nobody will ever talk about legacy. Apart of Mourinho, he is the one who got a good squad before him. Chelsea still a big squad team in time Reineri, inter has won many consecutive titles with Mancini, also now he got millions squad value at Real Madrid.
Back to Rafa, Liverpool current under performance because of Liverpool over achievement on 2008/09. Rafa who is master to make it Liverpool better with his squad. But Roy failed to adopt his style and ideas in his team. I’m not blaming Roy, but maybe he is not big-club-kind of manager. But still he can turn this around, but my first impression about him, is not great.
I consider it to be common sense to apportion a lot of blame on Rafa Benitez for Liverpool’s continued woes. Here are a few points I would like to make after reading your article:
[1] You state that in the Everton game three Roy Hodgson signings ‘failed’. The players in question were Konchesky, Meireles and Cole. I will deal with them (and his transfers in general) with my last comment.
[2] You make note of Hicks and Gillett making an approach for Klinsmann. Benitez is in no position to complain as he publicly did exactly the same thing with his pursuit of Barry. We all know the conclusion to that particular saga and the clear impact it had on the Liverpool team.
[3] People can whine about finances all they wish but it does not change the fact that Benitez spent over £300 million during his spell at Liverpool including eight players for eight figure sums (five under Hicks and Gillett and two in his last summer window). Benitez was backed with a lot of money but his transfer record was erratic at best. For him to have spend that much on a squad that is sub-par by top four standards does not reflect well on him and does Hodgson no favours at all.
[4] Benitez did well in Europe but I put that down to his conservative style of play being more suited to knock-out games and the fact that Liverpool often had little to realistically compete for in the league. They were usually nowhere near Man Utd and Chelsea while Arsenal were treading water, for their own reasons, during most of his time in England.
[5] Hodgson has made signings but most have been a case of simply replacing departing players instead of improving the squad or imposing his own style onto the team. If you look at Liverpool’s transfer dealing overall: Jones for Cavalieri, Konchesky for Insua, Poulsen for Mascherano, Meireles for Aquilani, Jovanovic (Benitez signing) for Riera and Cole for Benayoun. It should also be noted that he inherited a side sorely missing Alonso, inherited an unhappy Mascherano who subsequently demanded a move and inherited a disinterested Torres. It is hardly a recipe for improving an under performing team.
I am no Hodgson apologist and understand, to an extent, the people who are unhappy at Benitez getting practically all of the blame from some quarters. However the people who effectively absolve Benitez of all blame are far worse. Hodgson inherited a sub-par squad in the midst of an ownership struggle. Liverpool would have been a poisoned chalice for any manager. Hodgson has made some mistakes with his team selections and the players clearly share most of the blame for under performing but it is being disingenuous to allow Benitez to get away scot-free.
Mike – a few minor points:
1. It’s misleading to say that Benitez spent £300m when he recouped more than half of that in sales. For the last 3 seasons he’d been selling to buy – in some cases having to sell two players in order to buy one. Inevitably therefore, the squad got weaker. If I were to buy 5 £20,000 cars, selling each of them before buying the next one, you wouldn’t expect me to have £100,000 worth of cars at the end. It wouldn’t make any sense. As an aside whine about finances, Benitez certainly did make mistakes with transfers, the most obvious being Robbie Keane, but he was also sold for only a £2 million loss. The fact that that money then went missing is not down to Benitez. In previous times, Alex Ferguson has made many mistakes in the transfer window (Veron for example), but has always been given the money to rectify those mistakes. Only recently has that stopped happening for him and, surprise surprise, his squad has started getting weaker as a result.
2. Hodgson did indeed inherit a relatively poor squad compared to what you’d expect at Liverpool. However, it was not a particularly poor squad when compared to the rest of the league. Furthermore, it was a squad that finished 7th. Benitez was sacked – at least officially – for underachievement. Liverpool are now second from bottom. Now either the squad is so unbelievably poor that this is the best we can hope for (meaning that Benitez actually fantastically overachieved last year), or Hodgson is doing a really poor job. Whichever way you look at it, trying to pin Hodgson’s mess on Benitez simply doesn’t make any sense.
RE: James
1. I consider all of the transfer discussion, in general, to be misleading. Most simply make excuses for what Benitez did in the transfer market. I do not see the relevance in whether Benitez got his money from the owners, club profits, a loan, his back pocket or from selling players. The fact remains that he spent around £300m in transfer fees. When you look at what he got for that money you have to say it has been a disappointment. Considering the outlay, the team he created and the squad he left I do not think he did well enough and more that merits the criticism that has been coming his way. We could got bogged down in a discussion that focuses solely on transfers in/out per season and whether it lead to an improvement/decline in the position, team and overall squad. Take Glen Johnson as a single example. He was an improvement over Arbeloa and his attacking down the right flank was needed to compensate for the use of Kuyt ahead of him. However for the fee spent Liverpool could have improved other areas of the team and had a stronger squad overall. You might agree or you might not. It is a different discussion entirely.
2. Liverpool performed poorly under Benitez in his last season and, as I mentioned above, the squad Hodgson inherited was further weakened during the summer. The loss of an unhappy Mascherano and Torres being disinterested was/is a huge blow for Hodgson and the ownership struggle left him unable to strengthen the side. All he was able to do was try to replace departing players the best he could. Liverpool were already reliant on a handful of starters. The departure of Mascherano, injury to Kuyt, disinterest of Torres and Gerrard being sub-par have crippled the team. If Hodgson had inherited the same squad with players maintaining their performance level then he would rightfully be criticised for the current situation. That is not the case though. I blame Hodgson for following his ego and thinking he could miraculously turn the club around. It was never going to happen. Unfortunately if the players continue to under-perform then Hodgson will get the sack which I think is unfair on him. A manager can be faultless (which Hodgson is not) but if the players are not going to bother responding then he needs to go. I think the best situation would be to get the new manager in now to deal with the squad and assess what needs to be done in January. If the players still let their club, fans and profession down then Liverpool are screwed.
2. yeah we do – Liverpool finished 2nd with their best points haul since the 80s. as far as Alonso goes, after two abject seasons in three, it was not unreasonable for Beintez to source a replacement. if memory serves, he wanted to sign Barry (a mainstay of a City team currently residing in 2nd) and keep alonso, but was not supported by the board. I believe Juventus thought £13m was too expensive – says it all.
3. that old chestnut. it wasn’t £300 million actually, and as many other posters have noted, much of this was self generated through sales. Answer me this if one club spends over £100m in a season and the other a fraction of that, which club has a better chance of success? And what really gets me here is that rafa achieved considerable success in 6 years. he won the most prestigious trophy in europe, something both Real and Chelsea have failed to do over the same period with all their millions. he finished progressively higher in the league for 4 out of 6. I will not disagree that he did spend a lot of money, but it was hardly out of keeping with his rivals, who spent more. Someone will doubtlessly point to wenger, but more often than not Liverpool did better in Europe, domestic cups and the league, so that point carries little weight. Yes there were mistakes along the way and one terrible season, but his record is better than most.
3. Stupid point – he was successful in Europe. end of. you cannot throw in caveats – oh he was conservative. Mourinho’s inter hardly set the world alight last season, yet he was lauded. Rafa got the job done. That utd side had arguably one of the best players of his generation, and chelsea were funded to a level never before seen. Rafa joined English football as the posts were moved. The fact that Wenger (a genius) has been unable to win anything since serious money entered football says it all.
5. The same applies to rafa last season. He was not supported at a critical stage in the team’s development. Having just finished 2nd the owners should have invested in the squad. instead they withheld funds and only allowed rafa to spend what he generated in sales. that was a grievous mistake on the owners part.
Re: the unhappy players, sounds like 2004 when owen left and gerrard was looking to leave. but i suppose that’s also rafa’s fault?
look, roy has walked into a shit storm, there is no doubt. but for a team with the likes of reina, gerrard, cole, torres, agger, kuyt etc 19th really isn’t good enough. result have to improve or he has to go.
RE: David
2. In season 08–09 Liverpool finished second in the league but had their poorest cup runs (both domestically and in Europe) for several seasons. I consider the two to be linked. Alonso also had a great season no doubt in order to prove Benitez wrong. It was the beginning of the end as Benitez failed to build on the success, his system started to fall apart and the weaknesses in his squad were exposed.
3. The fundamental point is Benitez spent £300m on players but ended up with a weakened squad. See my response to James. To answer some of your questions:
a. It depends on whether there has been an improvement in terms of position, team and squad. The starting point of each team is also important. The latter is the argument Chelsea fans make to defend their spending under Abramovich and Man City are currently doing likewise.
b. I would remove the ‘considerable’ superlative from your statement. Benitez did well in Europe but his style of play is more suited to that type of competition. In his spell at Liverpool he won the Champions League and the FA Cup. A good achievement but Houllier won the UEFA Cup, the FA Cup and two League Cups. In the league Liverpool have always been a top four contender under both managers. Their league records are similar in that they both managed to finish second and both failed to finish in the top four twice. Was Benitez that much of an improvement? In the league he only finished above Man Utd/Chelsea once and even an Arsenal team that was spending little and taking a back-seat in the title race in order to blood youngsters finished above him three times.
4. It is not a stupid point. Benitez achieved European success because his side was more suited to playing in that competition. It was also the biggest competition he knew he had a chance to win. It is something Benitez deserves credit for.
5. Alonso leaving was a huge loss and entirely the fault of Benitez. He then spent big on Aquilani in a failed attempt to replace Alonso and bafflingly did likewise on Johnson. In the grand scheme of things was spending big on Johnson really necessary? Do you not think that spending a little less on a fit Alonso replacement and then investing in strengthening the squad like signing a striker to take the pressure off an unfit Torres would have been the better option? Benitez had £40 million to spend. I would call that support.
Mike:
I’m afraid it is wholly relevant where the money was spending came from. The fact that Chelsea and Man City’s money has come from their owners is the reason their squads are so good now: Man City, for example, have had the ability to purchase 4-5 strikers without selling any (5-6 if count Robinho as a striker), and it’s given them great strength in depth. Liverpool on the other hand, have had to sell Bellamy, Crouch and Cisse in order to strengthen other areas of the team (Keane being the anomaly, as the money from his sale simply disappeared – probably into Tom Hicks’ loan pot). Consequently, Liverpool’s back up to Torres is N’Gog, whilst Man City have so many players available they barely know who’s first choice.You can argue that Benitez made mistakes, and I certainly wouldn’t disagree with you, but to ignore the background he was working against is highly misleading. Benitez would have required a perfect transfer record to succeed against such a background, and they’re very rare amongst managers.
(Re Johnson – a considerable amount of the Johnson money was made up of debt owed to us by Portsmouth from their purchase of Crouch. Debt which we would have been unlikely to get back, given their financial situation at the time.)
In relation to Hodgson, there’s no doubt that he walked into a difficult situation this season. However, it’s not much more difficult than Benitez’s was, and we fired him. Gerrard was sub-par last season as well, Torres was injured for most of it, and Kuyt has only been injured for 1 game this season. Yes, Mascherano has gone, but he had the opportunity to replace him and instead bought Poulsen. It’s not that the money wasn’t available for a better quality replacement though: he’s also purchased Meireles, shipping Aquilani off on loan for a year – seemingly to save on wages and allow him to get Joe Cole in. He’s done similarly with Insua and Konchesky, at a cost and with no improvement. These are actions that do not make sense and that have not served to strengthen the squad. His tactics, meanwhile, have seen us comfortably beaten on a number of occasions, in manners that rarely occurred under Benitez. Meanwhile, his inflexible tactics are seeing Liverpool sit back and invite teams to score goals, whilst firing long balls to Torres as if he were Bobby Zamora (not the way to get him back into form).
Benitez is far from faultless: it was his fault that Liverpool finished 7th last year, outside of the top 4. The rest is up to Hodgson. A 7th place finish is beginning to look like a wonderful dream at present.
Agree 100%. As a bitter bluenose living in Sydney, I was lost for words at how poor the RS actually were. I’d been hearing for weeks that they were bad but seeing was believing. Anyway, keep up the good work Woy! COYB
good article
although i agree with a lot of it , i still think benitez should have had a season to repair the damage – especially as a new (more stable?) ownership has been ushered in only a couple of months into the season.
also I would add mascherano to gibfootball show’s list of good players left by benitez : a ridiculously cheap purchase (18m *including* wages!?). The much maligned kuyt , agger and benayoun also worthy of mentions.
Good article, I’m glad as an Arsenal fan I don’t have worry about this everyday. Here’s hoping they can stick in the top flight. I wanna see stoke b’burn n wolves go down (I’m a murphy apologist)
A good piece Iain, but I would argue Benitez built a team capable of a consistent 4th place finish and overachieved a couple of times and under achieved once. The season he overachieved (08/09) should have been built on, but as per usual in every season under the ownership of Hicks & Gillet, he was hamstrung by having to sell to buy. I’m convinced that if Gerrard and Carragher didn’t have the power they do at the club, Benitez would still be there now.
Nice piece.
Wrg to Liverpool bench warmer Yossi Benayoun surely he swapped one bench for another?
For sure I’m glad a did not just spunk 300 odd million on that shambles
Great article. All the talk about Rafa leaving us with an awful squad – did i miss something, my recollection is Rafa didn’t leave LFC he was well & truly pushed out. Who know’s where we’d be if Rafa hadn’t been sacked,maybe he’d be rebuilding the squad………. my feeling is we wouldn’t be 2nd from bottom!!
Great article Iain! Couldn’t agree more with what you’ve written!
I do think though people should stop putting the blame on the Managers and have the players take the brunt of the responsibility. Yes Rafa was making bad decisions and I think it was right that he went, and I was a fan of his. Roy needs to step up to the plate and show that he can manage a team and change formations when they’re not working rather than doing what Rafa did and keep the same formation from the beginning to the end regardless if we’re getting played off the field! That’s why he became so unpopular very quickly!
The players were average and disappointing last year to finish 7th, and this year………well, we’ll see! There won’t be relegation, but I think come January or the end of season, we will see a whole new Liverpool team than what we know it now. The players aren’t happy, but they only have themselves to blame for that! Alonso has gone, they need to get over that, how long are they going to hold onto that?!
Liverpool will be a mid table team for the next 3 years minimum until they get rid of the players that don’t want to be there and build a team that will again start bringing the trophies back!
JFT96 YNWA
I would prefer it if we stopped fixating on the past and focussed on the present.
If we continue wasting time talking about the team that Rafa left or the mistakes that Rafa made we’ll get to the end of the season and find ourselves talking about the team that Roy got relegated.
Rafa didn’t tell Roy to publicly slate the team that was beaten by Northampton. Rafa didn’t tell Roy to use a press conference to defend his C.V. And Rafa definitely didn’t pick up the phone and tell Roy that Sundays game was our best performance this season!
Roy is making his own mistakes and Roy is the one setting up this squad to play so abjectly.
The media have pretty much left Roy alone – so he can’t blame a hostile press either.
Scolari was highly rated and Chelsea pulled the trigger. Ramos had a reputation to envy yet Spurs refused to hang around.
Roy needs to build team spirit, confidence and unity – quickly. Because we are not too big a club to go down!
Haha mike you crack me up the way you write with such sarcasm about the failings of rafa I’m in hysterics. You must be one of the funniest guys going around did you get your wit from Hansen lawro or one of the other plonkers on sky. Here is some facts for Liverpool had the most yes the most players of any premier league side at the world cup. More than any other side even Chelsea and man u. Secondly this was achieved despite a net profit in the last 3 transfer windows Ronaldo sale aside for man u show us a pl team that is in the top half that has made a profit in any window let alone 3 in a row. From what he inherited rafa transformed the squad significantly and left the first team the academy and the football being played at a significantly higher standard the what he was given. Give me an example of players he bought that 1 have flopped and then been sold for a loss you could count them on less than one hand. It’s comments by “fans” like you that make the statement most knowledgable fans in the game come into significant doubt. Yet you want to defend Roy you must be Hansen or lawro’s cousin
True. Player power drove him out, sadly.
It may be a little off topic, but i see part of the problem being that Gerrard and Carragher were the last players to come through the academy. I have read Benitez took steps to rectify this, if true, and we are not going to know for another few years the current circumstances will be sen in a different light In the 1990′s we we consistently finished around 7th sometimes a little higher, with scouse players being the standout performers, and a steady stream of them coming through eg Macca, fowler, owen. It been over ten years since a class player has come through let alone the steady stream of squad players Man U have had, this is a major handicap for anyone in charge Roy or Rafa. apologies for grammar im at work and being watched like a hawk
Hodgson was brought in to improve on seventh place. Simpe. He can’t blame anyone but himself for being below that.
The rot set in long before Hicks and Gillette appeared on the scene.
The rot set in when Benitez won the Champions’ League. Forever and ever, amen. His job was safe forever, and we appeared to be a big club.
Because that’s what big clubs do, isn’t it? Win the Champions’ League.
We believed the hype.
We were safe forever. Finishing fourth forever was OK. Because big clubs win the Champions’ League. And if we can’t win the league, we can at least tell ourselves we’re a big club.
The rot has festered for a long, long time. The worst thing that happened to LFC was Istanbul 2005.